Monday, XXIX Week of Ordinary Time
(Luke 12:13-21)
Go into the houses of poor people as well as rich, in Mexico as well as the United States, and you are likely to see a lot of stuff. We live in an age of mass production when manufactured goods like leaves on a tree multiply beyond many persons’ belief. The gospel today serves as a warning about over-concern with material wealth, with stuff. It proposes that we should store up our treasure in heaven.
Admittedly the farmer in the story is an egotist. As one commentator says, “He talks to himself; he plans for himself; he congratulates himself.” But is he really so different from many people today? Too often people think primarily of themselves. Even children are planned and nurtured to fit their parents (often a single parent’s) designs. The barns which the farmer builds to store grain for the future serve the same purposes as savings portfolios today. They do not make the person bad; they make him or her rich. When pursued without a thought about others, they also make him foolish.
Of course, Jesus is not condemning prudent people with retirement plans and savings for emergencies. But he is criticizing severely non-attention to the needs of those having little to merely survive. Before we spend all that we have on “stuff” or invest all that we have for “tomorrow,” we must assist those who lack bread today. Ironically, this kind of concern proves to be the best plan for the future. Jesus makes clear throughout the gospel that sharing with the needy deposits a treasure where it counts the most.
Homilette for Friday, October 19, 2007
Friday, XXVIII Week of Ordinary Time, Memorial of Saint John de Brébeuf and Saint Isaac Jogues, priests and martyrs, and their companions, martyrs
(Luke 12:1-7)
At a Catholic boys’ high school a religion teacher used to sit outside the chapel with his grade book. When his students entered for Mass, the teacher apparently checked their names. It wasn’t long before Mass attendance spiked. A few of the cockier students did not stay very long but exited the chapel as soon as they were assured that their teacher had gone. We might say that these students were hypocritical like the Pharisees in the gospel today – that is, people who feign religion. We should note, however, that hypocrisy can run the other way as well. Hypocrites are also people who feign non-religion. This second type of hypocrisy is what Jesus warns his listeners against in the rest of the reading.
In all four gospels there is a sterling example of feigning non-religion. When Jesus is taken into custody, Peter denies that he is his disciple. Most of us will never be in such a situation where we feel our lives threatened if we profess faith in Christ. But we may be tempted to feign non-religion when declaring what we believe will make us appear different from the other folks present. Far from being scarce, such situations occur with frequency in this age of coarseness in entertainment. We should show our faith in God by walking out of erotic movies and turning off profane television. We are not “acting like babies” when we express how such grossness offends our faith-formed sensibilities. On the contrary, we are behaving like mature women and men who act on their convictions.
(Luke 12:1-7)
At a Catholic boys’ high school a religion teacher used to sit outside the chapel with his grade book. When his students entered for Mass, the teacher apparently checked their names. It wasn’t long before Mass attendance spiked. A few of the cockier students did not stay very long but exited the chapel as soon as they were assured that their teacher had gone. We might say that these students were hypocritical like the Pharisees in the gospel today – that is, people who feign religion. We should note, however, that hypocrisy can run the other way as well. Hypocrites are also people who feign non-religion. This second type of hypocrisy is what Jesus warns his listeners against in the rest of the reading.
In all four gospels there is a sterling example of feigning non-religion. When Jesus is taken into custody, Peter denies that he is his disciple. Most of us will never be in such a situation where we feel our lives threatened if we profess faith in Christ. But we may be tempted to feign non-religion when declaring what we believe will make us appear different from the other folks present. Far from being scarce, such situations occur with frequency in this age of coarseness in entertainment. We should show our faith in God by walking out of erotic movies and turning off profane television. We are not “acting like babies” when we express how such grossness offends our faith-formed sensibilities. On the contrary, we are behaving like mature women and men who act on their convictions.
Homilette for Thursday, October 18, 2007
Thursday, the Feast of St. Luke, evangelist
(Luke 10:1-9)
In New Mexico we find in pottery shops a stylized statuette called “The Story-teller.” It shows a woman with a pot on her head and one in her hands. Her mouth is wide open, obviously telling stories. Hanging onto the woman and all about her, children play animated by her words. In a way the woman represents St. Luke the Evangelist. More than any other evangelist, Luke features Jesus telling beautiful stories known as parables.
Most people are aware that the parables of the “Prodigal Son,” or as preachers prefer to say nowadays the “Prodigal Father,” and of the “Good Samaritan” are found only in Luke. Also, only Luke writes of Jesus telling the memorable stories of the “Rich Fool” and of “Lazarus and the Rich Man.” If Luke is exclusive in that he has unique parables to tell, we may point out that he is inclusive in a significant way as well. Luke frequently has a story featuring a woman juxtaposed with a story featuring a man. For example, after Jesus tells the parable of the shepherd searching for the lost sheep, Luke shows him speaking of the woman sweeping her home to find a lost coin.
But we must not think that Luke’s intention was only or mainly to portray Jesus as a story-teller. Like the other three evangelists Luke’s purpose is to show how Jesus is the son of God who has taken on human nature to save us from sin and death. The gospel passage today ends with Jesus instructing his disciples to tell the people, “The Kingdom of God is at hand.” In time that message will change. After Jesus rises from the dead, the apostles will preach Jesus as the incarnation of the Kingdom. As Peter tells the people of Jerusalem, “God raised up his servant and sent him to bless you by turning each of you from your evil ways.”
(Luke 10:1-9)
In New Mexico we find in pottery shops a stylized statuette called “The Story-teller.” It shows a woman with a pot on her head and one in her hands. Her mouth is wide open, obviously telling stories. Hanging onto the woman and all about her, children play animated by her words. In a way the woman represents St. Luke the Evangelist. More than any other evangelist, Luke features Jesus telling beautiful stories known as parables.
Most people are aware that the parables of the “Prodigal Son,” or as preachers prefer to say nowadays the “Prodigal Father,” and of the “Good Samaritan” are found only in Luke. Also, only Luke writes of Jesus telling the memorable stories of the “Rich Fool” and of “Lazarus and the Rich Man.” If Luke is exclusive in that he has unique parables to tell, we may point out that he is inclusive in a significant way as well. Luke frequently has a story featuring a woman juxtaposed with a story featuring a man. For example, after Jesus tells the parable of the shepherd searching for the lost sheep, Luke shows him speaking of the woman sweeping her home to find a lost coin.
But we must not think that Luke’s intention was only or mainly to portray Jesus as a story-teller. Like the other three evangelists Luke’s purpose is to show how Jesus is the son of God who has taken on human nature to save us from sin and death. The gospel passage today ends with Jesus instructing his disciples to tell the people, “The Kingdom of God is at hand.” In time that message will change. After Jesus rises from the dead, the apostles will preach Jesus as the incarnation of the Kingdom. As Peter tells the people of Jerusalem, “God raised up his servant and sent him to bless you by turning each of you from your evil ways.”
Homilette for Wednesday, October 17, 2007
Wednesday, XXVIII Week of Ordinary Time, Memorial of Saint Ignatius of Antioch, bishop and martyr
(Luke 11:42-46)
It sometimes seems that Jesus had a running battle with Pharisees. He always seems to be criticizing them. So it is important to note that in today’s gospel Jesus is at dinner in the home of a Pharisee as he has been before and will be again in Luke’s gospel. Obviously, Jesus has some differences of outlook, but he also shared much in common with Pharisees. We may profitably suppose that some of the harsh criticism of the gospels is not Jesus’ for the Pharisees of his time but the evangelists’ for Pharisee-like Christians a generation later.
Christians today, including Catholics, like the Pharisees of Jesus’ time, may pay too much attention to details and too little to the gospel message. Some go to church checking to see if the flowers there are actually freshly cut or artificial. (In order to prevent cheap imitations Church rubrics have called for fresh flowers by the altar.) Others might report the profanities used by a minister of the Church without realizing that they might be committing a graver sin of detraction.
Jesus compares the nit-picking Pharisees to “unseen graves.” He means to say that they are already dead because they do not have the love of God which gives life. Jesus with perfect judgment did not condemn all Pharisees, and we should be that much less given to criticism. Rather, we should make every effort to display the love of God that fills our hearts with the Holy Spirit.
(Luke 11:42-46)
It sometimes seems that Jesus had a running battle with Pharisees. He always seems to be criticizing them. So it is important to note that in today’s gospel Jesus is at dinner in the home of a Pharisee as he has been before and will be again in Luke’s gospel. Obviously, Jesus has some differences of outlook, but he also shared much in common with Pharisees. We may profitably suppose that some of the harsh criticism of the gospels is not Jesus’ for the Pharisees of his time but the evangelists’ for Pharisee-like Christians a generation later.
Christians today, including Catholics, like the Pharisees of Jesus’ time, may pay too much attention to details and too little to the gospel message. Some go to church checking to see if the flowers there are actually freshly cut or artificial. (In order to prevent cheap imitations Church rubrics have called for fresh flowers by the altar.) Others might report the profanities used by a minister of the Church without realizing that they might be committing a graver sin of detraction.
Jesus compares the nit-picking Pharisees to “unseen graves.” He means to say that they are already dead because they do not have the love of God which gives life. Jesus with perfect judgment did not condemn all Pharisees, and we should be that much less given to criticism. Rather, we should make every effort to display the love of God that fills our hearts with the Holy Spirit.
Homilette for Tuesday, October 16, 2007
Tuesday, XXVIII Week of Ordinary Time
(Romans 1:16-25)
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights...” Most of us recognize these words from the Declaration of Independence almost as surely as we recognize the American flag. By speaking of truths that are “self-evident,” they imply a reality that many Americans have trouble seeing. That reality is the existence of a natural law which governs human actions.
In the reading from Romans today Paul makes reference to natural law. He is not talking about Jews when he writes, “...for although they knew God they did not accord him glory as God or give him thanks.” Rather, he is referring to pagan Romans and Greeks who from observing human nature should be aware that their carnal excess is immoral. For this reason Paul is exhorting Christians Romans not to imitate these people.
Catholics especially believe that society should heed the natural law. We do not claim that it is always easy to discern its contents although its tenets in some cases like the prohibition of abortion and of so-called homosexual marriage are obvious enough. We also see the Ten Commandments as embodying the natural law and therefore there is no real need to ban its image in public courts.
(Romans 1:16-25)
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights...” Most of us recognize these words from the Declaration of Independence almost as surely as we recognize the American flag. By speaking of truths that are “self-evident,” they imply a reality that many Americans have trouble seeing. That reality is the existence of a natural law which governs human actions.
In the reading from Romans today Paul makes reference to natural law. He is not talking about Jews when he writes, “...for although they knew God they did not accord him glory as God or give him thanks.” Rather, he is referring to pagan Romans and Greeks who from observing human nature should be aware that their carnal excess is immoral. For this reason Paul is exhorting Christians Romans not to imitate these people.
Catholics especially believe that society should heed the natural law. We do not claim that it is always easy to discern its contents although its tenets in some cases like the prohibition of abortion and of so-called homosexual marriage are obvious enough. We also see the Ten Commandments as embodying the natural law and therefore there is no real need to ban its image in public courts.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)